Home > Community Dashboard > All Data
Search for Indicators

All Data

Turn Colorblind Mode On See the Legend

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults who Binge Drink

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink

23.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 23.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001000100 has a value of 23.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer

7.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 7.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001000100 has a value of 7.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

87.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 87.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001000100 has a value of 87.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Colon Cancer Screening

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening

76.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 76.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001000100 has a value of 76.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

81.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 81.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 11001000100 has a value of 81.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

78.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 78.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 11001000100 has a value of 78.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Pap Test in Past 3 Years: 21-65

Current Value:

Pap Test in Past 3 Years: 21-65

88.6%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (79.5%), 11001000100 has a value of 88.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(79.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes

5.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 5.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 11001000100 has a value of 5.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
Compared to the Diabetes Working Group (4%), the target has not been met.
Diabetes Working Group
(4%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

50.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 50.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Over time, the 11001000100 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:

Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

2.2%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Over time, the 11001000100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

Persons with a Disability

5.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Over time, the 11001000100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:

Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

2.1%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Over time, the 11001000100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:

Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

1.6%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Over time, the 11001000100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:

Persons with a Vision Difficulty

1.1%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Over time, the 11001000100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:

Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

2.5%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Over time, the 11001000100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:

Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

68.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 68.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 74.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 68.7%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (73.6%), 11001000100 has a value of 68.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(73.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance

3.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 11001000100 has a value of 3.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription

97.3%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 97.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 83.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

Current Value:

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

98.7%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 98.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 91.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:

Persons with an Internet Subscription

98.7%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 98.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 87.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:

Adults who Experienced a Stroke

1.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 1.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), 11001000100 has a value of 1.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.3%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:

Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

3.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 3.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.9%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (6.1%), 11001000100 has a value of 3.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.1%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

Current Value:

Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

71.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 71.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 76.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.7%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 11001000100 has a value of 71.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:

Cholesterol Test History

90.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 90.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 84.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.9%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), 11001000100 has a value of 90.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(86.4%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:

High Blood Pressure Prevalence

23.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 23.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), 11001000100 has a value of 23.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.7%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:

High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

32.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 32.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), 11001000100 has a value of 32.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:

Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

21.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 21.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), 11001000100 has a value of 21.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

10.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), 11001000100 has a value of 10.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.7%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Life Expectancy

Current Value:

Life Expectancy

85.6
Years
(2010-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 85.6 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 78.5 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8.
U.S. Census Tracts
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

Current Value:

Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

49.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 49.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 36.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 31.9%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), 11001000100 has a value of 49.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(37.9%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

Current Value:

Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

57.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 57.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 42.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 37.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), 11001000100 has a value of 57.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(43.7%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with a Disability

14.4%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Over time, the 11001000100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

5.8%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Over time, the 11001000100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

2.9%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Over time, the 11001000100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

1.3%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Over time, the 11001000100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

7.1%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Over time, the 11001000100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

3.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 3.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (13.4%), 11001000100 has a value of 3.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

Adults who Visited a Dentist

79.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 79.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 63.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (64.8%), 11001000100 has a value of 79.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(64.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

Adults with Arthritis

18.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 18.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (25.2%), 11001000100 has a value of 18.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(25.2%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:

Adults with Kidney Disease

2.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 2.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), 11001000100 has a value of 2.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.1%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults who are Sedentary

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary

9.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 11001000100 has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults with COPD

Current Value:

Adults with COPD

3.3%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 3.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), 11001000100 has a value of 3.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.4%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:

Adults with Current Asthma

9.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 9.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), 11001000100 has a value of 9.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.7%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke

6.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 6.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), 11001000100 has a value of 6.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.5%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese

17.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 17.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 11001000100 has a value of 17.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

Insufficient Sleep

23.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 23.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), 11001000100 has a value of 23.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.7%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

5.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 5.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (10.9%), 11001000100 has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.9%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

Current Value:

Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

7.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), 11001000100 has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.1%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:

Children in Single-Parent Households

22.3%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 22.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.7%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Households without a Vehicle

Current Value:

Households without a Vehicle

22.5%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 22.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Over time, the 11001000100 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work

24.4
Minutes
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 24.4 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.8 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0.
U.S. Census Tracts
Over time, the 11001000100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

13.4%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Over time, the 11001000100 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:

Workers who Drive Alone to Work

36.8%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 36.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 84.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Over time, the 11001000100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Households with Cash Public Assistance Income

Current Value:

Households with Cash Public Assistance Income

0.5%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 0.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Over time, the 11001000100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate

0.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
(2014-2018)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Homeownership

Current Value:

Homeownership

49.3%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 49.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 58.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 41.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Over time, the 11001000100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

33.4%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 33.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Over time, the 11001000100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Income Inequality

Current Value:

Income Inequality

0.516
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 0.516 which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.419 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.463.
U.S. Census Tracts
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Median Household Income

Current Value:

Median Household Income

$192,727
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of $192,727 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than $59,550 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $44,310.
U.S. Census Tracts
Over time, the 11001000100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Per Capita Income

Current Value:

Per Capita Income

$142,543
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of $142,543 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than $29,774 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $22,720.
U.S. Census Tracts
Over time, the 11001000100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level

8.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Over time, the 11001000100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level

3.3%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 3.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Over time, the 11001000100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

2.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 2.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Over time, the 11001000100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

88.8%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 88.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 69.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Over time, the 11001000100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level

6.4%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 6.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Over time, the 11001000100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

0.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.7%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Over time, the 11001000100 value is staying the same.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working

0.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

Census Tract: 11001000100 People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

89.5%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 89.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 25.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 15.7%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Over time, the 11001000100 value is staying the same.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Census Tract: 11001000100 People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

97.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 97.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 90.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.9%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Over time, the 11001000100 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card